A. Yes. Teachers and principals have always been evaluated and held to specific standards. The APPR system was revamped in 2010, 2012 and, 2013 as a result of the federal Race to the Top education reform initiative, and again in 2015 as part of the 2015-16 New York State budget, which included an ambitious education reform agenda. Under the APPR system, evaluation plans must adhere to more stringent guidelines set by the state. A portion of the evaluations is directly tied to student performance on state exams or other state-approved learning measures. School districts/boards of cooperative educational educational services (BOCES) plans must be submitted to and approved by the NYS Education Department.
A: The evaluation system was one pillar of the larger federal Race to the Top education reform initiative that aims to improve the quality of instruction in our schools and, in turn, improve student performance and college and career readiness. The APPR requirements aim to provide standardized, objective evaluation results that can be used to better focus professional development for teachers and principals. According to the State Education Department, â€œThe purpose of the evaluation system is to ensure that there is an effective teacher in every classroom and an effective leader in every school.â€�
A. As part of the 2015-16 New York state budget, lawmakers approved the Education Transformation Act of 2015, which includes Section 3012-d of Education Law and Subpart 30-3 of the Regulations of the Commissioner of Education. Under the new legislation, school districts and BOCES are expected to submit new APPR plans for teachers and building principals, and gain the NYS Education Department's approval for such plans, by Nov. 15, 2015 in order to receive their scheduled increases in state aid for the 2015-16 school year and future school years until a new plan is in place. The newly redesigned teacher evaluation system is one part of an ambitious education reform agenda that addresses other key areas, such as teacher preparation, certification and tenure.
A. School districts and
BOCES across the state are in various stages of negotiating new APPR
plans that meet the requirements set forth in Education Law 3012-d.
Districts and BOCES with hardships that affect their ability to meet
the Nov. 15, 2015 deadline for implementing the new APPR plan during
the 2015-16 school year are required to submit hardship waiver
applications to the NYS Education Department in order to extend this
deadline without risk of losing their eligibility for a state aid
increase. All districts and BOCES granted hardship waivers must
continue to implement their previously approved APPR plans until a
new plan is agreed to by the district and local bargaining unit.
New APPR plans approved prior to March 1, 2016 will apply to the 2015-16 school year. New plans approved after March 1, 2016 will apply to the 2016-17 school year.
A. Just as they did under the previous APPR system, under the system approved by the state in 2015 teachers and principals will earn one of four final ratings: highly effective, effective, developing or ineffective (HEDI). However, the new APPR framework does away with the three-component system (20 percent for student growth, 20 percent for student achievement, and 60 percent for observations) and replaces it with a system where student performance and observation scores are each weighted and combined in a state-designed matrix to determine a final overall ranking. Each component has mandatory and optional subcomponents, some of which will be locally negotiated in accordance with state guidelines. Details can be found at engageny.org.
A. No, school districts/BOCES are prohibited by law from releasing APPR scores to the public. Under the 2015 state law, the following individual teacher and principal data may be released to parents: student performance score, teacher observation score and overall rating. By law, scores can only be released to parents who specifically request them and they can only be released for a studentâ€™s current teacher(s) and principal. Parents who wish to request these scores should contact their childâ€™s school.
A. Guidance from the NYS Education Department has been that districts are not expected to consider educator experience as part of the APPR process.
A. Teachers and principals are observed by trained evaluators selected by the district/BOCES. All lead evaluators, independent observers and peer observers must complete training.
A. Any teacher/principal rated as developing or ineffective will receive a negotiated Teacher Improvement Plan (TIP) or Principal Improvement Plan (PIP). These plans identify areas in need of improvement and include a timeline for achieving improvement, the manner in which the improvement will be assessed and, where appropriate, activities to support improvement in those areas. A pattern of ineffective performance could lead to an expedited hearing process for termination. Teachers/principals who receive a rating of developing or ineffective may file an appeal.
A. Put simply, they donâ€™t compare. While all districts must follow a certain set of guidelines when developing APPR plans, and then those plans must be approved by the State Education Department, many of the standards within these plans vary by district. This includes, but is not limited to, the observation rubrics districts decide to use, the student growth measures and assessments used in areas other than state standardized exams, and the way in which points are assigned within the different components. Similarly, districts routinely renegotiate their APPR plans with local unions, so it may be difficult to compare effectiveness ratings even within the same district from year to year.
The stateâ€™s APPR law requires that building principals be evaluated based on the state guidelines. Other administrators within the district/BOCES must be evaluated based on the districtâ€™s/BOCES' procedures outlined in collective bargaining agreements. Under state law, superintendents are required to be evaluated each year by the districtâ€™s governing body (typically the Board of Education).